From: <¢DN Microsoft Internet Explorer 5 Ax|s> Subject: Overview ACLS 2000 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 02:24:11 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Location: http://www.ace.cc/Overview%20of%20ACLS%202000.htm X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Overview ACLS 2000

This article is reprinted from = the=20 Supplement to Circulation, July 22, 2000

 

Part 6:=20 Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support

Section=20 1: Introduction to ACLS 2000: Overview of Recommended

Changes=20 in ACLS From the Guidelines 2000 Conference

Evidence-Based = International Resuscitation=20 Guidelines

At the Second = American Heart=20 Association International Evidence Evaluation Conference and the = international=20 Guide­lines 2000 Conference on CPR and ECC, the high level of = participation=20 of international experts changed profoundly the way all future = resuscitation=20 guidelines will be developed. Future resuscitation guidelines cannot = achieve=20 validity and consensus without international input. Enrichment comes = when=20 experts from different countries=97with different systems, different = personnel,=20 and different resources=97share their ideas, perspectives, and = experiences. Our=20 guidelines are no longer just descriptive=97"This is how we = do it here=94=97=20 but now can also be prescriptive=97"This=20 is how we should be doing it in the future.=94

The experts at the = conferences reached a strong consensus to change a number of the CPR and = ECC=20 guidelines. Large portions of the earlier guidelines remain unaltered or = have=20 been refined on the basis of new data. Many topics, however, have been = updated=20 to reflect consensus opinions developed according to the principles of=20 evidence-based medicine. While the evidence-based approach constrains = the number=20 of new guidelines endorsed, it clarifies perspectives on the evidence=20 reviewed=97and on the amount of research still needed.

 

New Topics, = New=20 Problems, New Guidelines

Because of rapid = development=20 of new therapies and strate­gies, the sections on acute myocardial=20 infarction (MI) (now acute = coronary=20 syndromes) and stroke have undergone major change. We have expanded = the=20 section on special resuscita­tion situations for experienced = providers. This=20 includes new topics that are known to be important causes of cardiac = arrest but=20 that we have not addressed before, for example, cardiac arrest and = altered vital=20 signs caused by drug overdoses and toxins, life-threatening electrolyte=20 abnormalities, near-fatal asthma, and anaphylaxis. These problems = challenge ACLS=20 providers all over the world.

This introductory = ACLS=20 section discusses these changes in recommendations, based on evidence = review and=20 consensus opinion. The reasons for the class recommendations and the=20 evidence-based approach are reviewed briefly with comments from the = Evidence=20 Evaluation Conference and the Guidelines 2000 Conference. The full = details of=20 this intense process will be published in the Proceedings of the Guidelines 2000 = Conference and in the journal Annals=20 of Emergency Medicine.

The new = recommendations=20 include the following:

 

Pharmacology of=20 Resuscitation

=B7   Amiodarone (Class = IIb) and=20 procainamide (Class IIb) are recommended ahead of lidocaine and = adenosine=20 for the initial treatment of hemodynamically stable wide-complex = tachycardia.=20 especially in patients with compromised cardiac function.

=B7 Amiodarone = and sotalol = (a drug that awaits = Food and=20 Drug Administration approval for US use) are new agents recommended as = Class IIa=20 agents for the treatment of stable=20 monomorphic and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT).

=B7  References to bretylium have = been dropped=20 from the ventricular fibrillation (VF)/pulseless VT algorithm. In 1998 = through=20 2000, severe problems with obtaining the raw materials to produce = bretylium=20 stopped the supply for a number of months. These guidelines must avoid=20 generating a demand that cannot be met by an undependable source. The = world=92s=20 natural sources of bretylium appear to be nearly exhausted. Bretylium = remains=20 acceptable to use, but it is no longer recommended. Bretylium has a high = incidence of side effects, particularly hypotension, in the = postresuscitation=20 setting. Bretylium stays as a Class IIb recommendation because no new,=20 supportive information is available and some studies question its=20 efficacy.

=B7   Lidocaine is an = established agent=20 that suffered during our new emphasis on evidence. Although lidocaine = remains=20 acceptable as an antiarrhythmic to use for the treatment of = shock-refractory VF=20 and pulseless VT, the evidence supporting its efficacy is poor and=20 methodologically weak (levels 6, 7, and 8 only). The evidence supporting = amiodarone is much stronger (one level I study) and justifies use of = amiodarone=20 before lidocaine in the opinion of many. The conference experts = concluded that=20 lidocaine could continue to be used for VF/VT but that given the = antiquated=20 evidence, it merits only an Indeterminate class of recommendation (Class = Indeterminate).

Lidocaine has not = been=20 recommended for routine prophylaxis of ventricular arrhythmias in the = setting of=20 acute MI for >8 years. Conference experts re-examined this topic and=20 concluded that the data do not justify changing the classification of = lidocaine=20 to a Class III (evidence-of-harm)=20 agent.

=B7  Amiodarone, a respected = and=20 effective agent in the hospi­tal, catheterization suite, and = critical care=20 unit, is included only in the notes for the VF/pulseless VT algorithm. = The=20 algorithm states =93consider antiarrhythmics,=94 referring the reader to = several=20 notes. Methodological problems in study­ing out-of-hospital VFIVT = arrest=20 limit the conclusions that can be drawn about any antiarrhythmic. The = evidence=20 supporting antiarrhythmics in general is only fair, and this accounts = for the=20 fact that all antiarrhythmics are lumped into one Class IIb = =93consider=94 category.=20 However, on the strength of design and execution in the ARREST study = (Kudenchuk=20 PJ, Cobb LA, Copass MK, Cummins RO, Doherty AM, et al. N EngI J Med. = 1999;341:871=97878),=20 amiodarone does have better evidence-based support than any other=20 antiarrhythmic. The expert panel members would have no problem with = clinicians=20 routinely using amiodarone as the first-choice antiarrhythmic for=20 shock-refractory VF/VT. This practice decision, however, must be made = with a=20 clear awareness that the evidence=97 powerful in the design=97was weak = in the=20 conclusions.

=B7  Magnesium has shown = effectiveness=20 only in the treatment of known hypomagnesemic states and torsades de = pointes,=20 for which it=20 still = has a=20 Class IIb recommendation.

=B7  Vasopressin (arginine = vasopressin)=20 may be a more effective pressor agent than epinephrine for promoting the = return=20 of spontaneous circulation in cardiac arrest. The evidence from = prospective=20 clinical trials in humans is limited but consistently positive (Class = IIb).=20 Vasopressin (40 U IV, not repeated) may = be=20 substituted for epinephrine as an alternative Class IIb agent. The lower = adverse=20 effects profile may be the major indication for vasopressin.

=B7  Research on high-dose = epinephrine=20 has not yet shown that routine use of initial and repeated or escalating = doses=20 of epinephrine can improve survival in cardiac arrest (Class = Indeterminate). Nor=20 has high-dose epinephrine (0.1 mg/kg) in adults been shown to improve = survival=20 or neurological outcomes. Some troublesome evidence indicates that = cardiac=20 arrest survivors who received high-dose epinephrine have more post = resuscitation=20 complications than survivors who received the standard dose. Because of = the=20 potential for harm, high-dose epinephrine (0.1 mg/kg) is not recommended = (Class=20 Indeterminate).

 

Ventilation

 =B7   The experts on the = Ventilation=20 Panels recommend a reduc­tion in the ventilation tidal volume for = patients=20 not in cardiovascular = collapse to=20 approximately one half of that recommended previously. Volume should = approximate=20 6 to 7 mL/kg over 1.5 to 2 seconds (Class IIa). Higher volumes increase = risk of=20 gastric inflation without improving blood oxygenation. For clinical = guidance,=20 resuscitation professionals can use the =93chest rise=94 sign as a rough = indication=20 of ventilation tidal volumes that are in the range of 6 to 7 mL/kg. = Smaller=20 tidal volumes, however, raise the risk of inducing both hypoxia and = hypercarbia.=20 Consequently, a widespread recommendation to provide supplemental = oxygen.=20 adjusted on the basis of oxygen saturation readings, appears laudable, = although=20 specific. high-level evidence to support this recommendation has not yet = become=20 available.

=B7   Tracheal = intubation in=20 unconscious patients should be attempted only by healthcare providers=20 experienced in performing this skill. Such persons should increase their = experience in tracheal intubations steadily by performing intubations = frequently=20 or by retraining regularly. Only personnel with advanced life support = training=20 and documented skills should attempt tracheal intubation. Furthermore, = ALS=20 providers unable to obtain regular field experience = (non=97evidence-based=20 guideline: 6 to 12 times per year) should use alternative, non-invasive=20 techniques for airway management.

=B7   In the absence of a = bag-mask device=20 or authorization to perform tracheal intubation, healthcare providers = may use=20 alternative airways (laryngeal mask airway, esophageal-tracheal = Combitube,=20 pharyngotracheal lumen airway) (Class IIb).

=B7   In the opinion of many = experts the=20 single most important new recommendation from the Guidelines 2000 is = long=20 overdue: emergency responders must confirm tracheal tube position = by=20 using non-physical examination techniques. These include esophageal = detector=20 devices, qualitative end-tidal CO2 indicators, and capnographic and = capnometric=20 devices. In patients not in full cardiac arrest these devices are = Class IIa.=20 In cardiac arrest and conditions of low pulmonary flow, these devices = are=20 lowered to Class IIB because the devices may falsely indicate esophageal = placement, leading to unnecessary removal of a properly placed = tube.

=B7   Growing evidence suggests = that tracheal tube=20 dislodgments after a = successful tracheal=20 tube insertion may be occurring at much higher rates than previously = suspected.=20 Emphasis should be placed on securing the tube carefully with a tie or = tape.=20 With little evidence to directly support any specific commercial device, = tracheal tube holders are a Class IIb recommendation. During long = transport=20 efforts in the out-of-hospital setting, restless intubated patients can = be=20 fitted with a cervical collar and immobilized with sandbags (or some = other=20 validated technique) to prevent accidental tube dislodgment. With little = evidence to directly support any specific commercial device, tracheal = tube=20 holders are a Class IIb recommendation. During long transport efforts in = the=20 out-of-hospital setting, intubated patients are at high risk for = tracheal tube=20 dislodgment. Monitors for oxygen saturation and end-tidal CO2 = levels=20 can detect tube dislodgments. The best technique, however, to prevent, = detect,=20 and correct tube dislodgment is the constant vigilance of care=20 providers.

 

Defibrillation

 =B7   Healthcare providers with = a duty to=20 perform CPR need to be trained, equipped. and authorized to use an = automated=20 external defibrillator (AED) (Class IIa).

=B7   Hospitals need to = establish a=20 comprehensive program for in-hospital early CPR and early = defibrillation.=20 Hospital staff=20 members trained in CPR need to be capable of providing early=20 defibrillation.

=B7  Hospitals need to establish = programs to=20 achieve early defibrillation throughout the facilities and in related = patient=20 care areas (Class I).

 

Public = Access=20 Defibrillation Programs

 Public access = defibrillation=20 (PAD) programs have the potential to reduce one of the major health = problems=97VF=20 induced cardiac arrest.

AEDs are = recommended for=20 public sites with a high probability of at least one use every 5 years (1 arrest per = 5=20 years). Select=20 sites for AED deployment that are within a 5-minute radius of the = majority of=20 expected arrests but outside a 5-minute radius of the closest EMS units = (Class=20 IIb).

 

Acute = Coronary=20 Syndromes

 The prehospital = 12-lead=20 ECG=20 improves prehospital diagnosis, reduces hospital-based time to = treatment,=20 identifies patients requiring reperfusion, contributes to mortality = reduction,=20 and facilitates triage to cardiac centers with interventional = facilities. The=20 prehospital ECG is useful and effective in prehospital urban/suburban = EMS=20 systems and should become standard equipment on all ACLS units that = handle acute=20 coronary syndrome patients (Class IIa).

Prehospital fibrinolytic therapy is beneficial when = the=20 transport of patients with acute infarction from home to the hospital is = prolonged and should be considered by busy EMS systems (Class IIa). At = present,=20 prehospital screening of chest pain patients allows ambulance personnel = to=20 notify hospital personnel that a person with a probable acute MI is en = route for=20 further evaluation and care.

=97If the total = time of the=20 following 2 intervals exceeds 60 minutes, consider prehospital = fibrinolytics:=20 (1) onset of chest pain to contact of ACLS personnel with the patient, = and (2)=20 arrival of ACLS personnel at the patient=92s side to arrival at the=20 hospital.

=97In Europe a = prehospital=20 fibrinolytic program is considered whenever the above intervals exceed = 30=20 minutes. Moreover, if the Emergency Department has a door-to = fibrinolytic=20 interval consistently >60 minutes, prehospital fibrinolytic treatment = should=20 offer superior outcomes.

Angioplasty is an=20 alternative to fibrinolytic therapy (Class I) in = centers with=20 high volume and experienced operators. Patients in cardiogenic shock who = are=20 <75 years of age need transportation to cardiac interventional = centers for=20 initiation of primary angioplasty and intra-aortic bal­loon = placement.=20 Benefit occurs, however, only when door-to-balloon times average = 90 minutes (Class = I).=20 Patients who are not eligible for fibrinolytic therapy because of = increased risk=20 of intracranial bleeding need to be trans­ported or transferred to = these=20 centers (Class IIa). Patients with large anterior infarctions, low blood = pressure (systolic blood pressure ≤100 mm Hg), increased heart = rate (≥100 beats=20 per minute), or rales more than one third of the way up are also = candidates=20 (Class IIa). Prehospital EMS systems should develop triage policies = where=20 applicable.

=97Antiplatelet = therapy with=20 glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for patients with non-Q-wave MI and = high-risk=20 unstable angina provides clinically significant benefit (Class IIa).=20 Antithrombin therapy with low-molecular-weight heparins is now an = alternative to=20 unfractionated heparin in high-risk unstable angina/non-Q-wave MI = patients. Data=20 for this class of agents, however, is heterogeneous, in part because of = variable=20 anti-factor Xa inhibition (Class Indeterminate). The dose of = unfractionated=20 heparin, when used as adjunctive therapy with fibrin-specific lytics = (alteplase,=20 reteplase) is now reduced to a bolus of 60 U/kg (maximum 4000 U) and an = infusion=20 of 12 IU/kg per hour. This dose reduction will help to minimize the = incidence of=20 intracerebral hemorrhage.

=97Metabolic = manipulation of=20 the infarct with glucose-potassium-insulin is under continuing = investigation.=20 This therapy is acceptable and of some benefit for diabetic patients and = patients undergoing reperfusion (Class IIb).

=97All patients = with acute MI,=20 including non-Q-wave MI, need aspirin and (3-blockers in the absence of=20 contraindications (Class I). Patients with a large anterior = infarc­tion,=20 left ventricular dysfunction, and ejection fraction <40% need early=20 angiotensin-converting enzyme inhi­bition in the absence of=20 hypotension.

 

Stroke

 =B7   Intravenous = recombinant tissue=20 plasminogen activator (rtPA) improves neurological outcome when = administered=20 within 3 hours of stroke onset in patients who meet=20 fibrinolytic criteria (Class I). Patients with stroke presenting within = 3 hours=20 require emergent triage. The urgency should equal that of an acute MI, = with=20 ST-segment elevation.

=B7  The use of rtPA = in patients with = symptom=20 onset between 3 and 6 hours of presentation at an Emergency Department = is under=20 investigation. While subgroups of such patients may benefit from = fibrinolytic=20 treatment, routine use is not currently recommended (Class=20 Indeterminate).

=B7  Prourokinase has been = found to=20 improve neurological outcome in patients treated within 3 to 6 hours in = one=20 completed but unpublished study. Review of the published data and = additional=20 studies are needed before this fibrinolytic agent can be recommended = (Class=20 Indeterminate).

=B7  EMS systems should implement a=20 prehospital stroke protocol to rapidly identify patients who may = benefit=20 from fibrinolytic therapy. This approach is similar to the protocol for = chest=20 pain patients (Class IIb). Transport patients who may be candidates for=20 fibrinolytic therapy to hospitals identified as acute stroke treatment=20 facilities with 24-hour availability of computerized tomography and=20 interpretation (Class IIb).

 

Postresuscitation=20 Care

 =B7  Following cardiac arrest, do = not actively=20 rewarm patients who are mildly hypothermic (Class IIb). Active = initiation of=20 hypothermia after cardiac arrest is under clinical investigation (Class=20 Indeterminate). Treat febrile patients to achieve normothermia, a goal = of early=20 therapy (Class IIa).

=B7  Following cardiac arrest, = ventilatory=20 values in patients who require mechanical ventilation should be = maintained=20 within the normal range (Class IIa). Hyperventilation may be harmful and = should=20 be avoided (Class III). An exception is the use of hyperventilation in = patients=20 who have signs of cerebral herniation after resuscitation.

 

Toxicology

 =B7  Cocaine use is associated with = serious=20 ventricular arrhyth­mias and acute coronary syndromes. The use of=20 (β-blockers in patients with cocaine-associated acute coronary = syndromes has=20 caused coronary vasoconstriction and should be avoided (Class III). = Nitrates=20 should be first-line therapy (Class I) together with benzodiazepines = (Class=20 IIa). α-Adrenergic blocking agents may induce tachycardia and = hypotension and=20 should be reserved for patients who do not respond to nitrates and=20 benzodiazepines (Class IIb).

=B7  Hypotension or ventricular = arrhythmias=20 occur with tricyclic overdose. The induction of systemic alkalosis (pH = of 7.50=20 to 7.55) is the treatment of choice = (Class=20 IIa). Antiarrhythmic agents such as lidocaine or procainamide have not = been=20 studied in this setting (Class Indeterminate).

=B7  Acute respiratory failure = (respiratory=20 acidosis and hypoxemia) may occur with opiate overdose. Reverse these=20 abnormalities by mechanical ventilation before the administration of = naloxone.=20 This will reduce the incidence of pulmonary edema and serious = arrhythmias=20 associated with abrupt catecholamine elevation (Class IIa).

 

Overview of = ACLS

ACLS includes the = knowledge=20 and skills necessary to provide the appropriate early treatment for=20 cardiopulmonary arrest. Additional important areas include the proper = management=20 of situations likely to lead to cardiac arrest and stabilization of the = patient=20 in the early period following successful resuscitation. ACLS includes = (1) basic=20 life support: (2) use of advanced equipment and special techniques for=20 establishing and maintaining effective ventilation and circulation: (3) = ECG=20 monitoring, 12-lead ECG interpretation, and arrhythmia recognition; (4)=20 establishment and maintenance of intravenous access; (5) therapies for = the=20 treatment of patients with cardiac or respiratory arrest (including=20 stabilization in the post arrest phase); (6) treatment of patients with=20 suspected acute coronary syndromes, including acute MI; and (7) = strategies for=20 rapid assessment and treatment with tPA of eligible stroke patients. = ACLS=20 includes the knowledge, training, and judgment required to use these = skills and=20 the ability to perform them.

Communities should = provide=20 rapid and effective ACLS. Every community should strive continually to = implement=20 the Chain of Survival and provide as many high-quality ACLS components = as=20 possible, in particular very early defibrillation using AEDs (see = =93Part 4: The=20 Automated External Defibrillator: Key Link in the Chain of Survival=94) = and=20 non-invasive airway support.

BLS and ACLS = should be=20 integrated into a community as part of an EMS system. This system should = have=20 sufficient laypersons trained in BLS to ensure immediate ventilatory and = circulatory assistance to any cardiac arrest victim within 5 minutes and immediate entry = of that=20 victim into the EMS system. We strongly encourage implementation of = public=20 access defibrillation in high-risk settings. In turn the emergency care = system,=20 under medical supervision, should provide rescue personnel adequately = trained in=20 BLS and ACLS to respond promptly when summoned. ACLS must be continued = either=20 until the patient has been admitted to a medical facility capable of = continuing=20 care or until life support efforts have been terminated by order of the=20 responsible physician or by a properly executed advance = directive.

The same level of = training,=20 commitment, and medical supervision should be applied to in-hospital = ACLS. In=20 particular, prompt BLS and rapid defibrillation should be available in = all areas=20 of a healthcare facility (Class IIa).

 

BLS and = Early=20 Defibrillation

For people in = cardiac=20 arrest, rapid defibrillation in = <5=20 minutes is a high-priority goal. Community and in-hospital ACLS must = be=20 supported by a well-established BLS program that can provide immediate = emergency=20 CPR. The Evidence Evaluation Conference and Guidelines 2000 Conference = again=20 affirmed and endorsed the principle of early defibrilla­tion from = 1991 =97 the=20 recommendation that healthcare provid­ers with a duty to respond to = cardiac=20 arrest should be educated, equipped. and authorized to perform automated = external defibrillation (Class IIa). The ideal response time is achieved = when=20 people collapse in front of a person who has an AED. Such cases occur in = many=20 locations, and in general the survival rate can be 70% to = 80%.

For respiratory = arrest,=20 airway adjuncts and ventilation devices should be readily available. In = cardiac=20 arrest, the need for early defibrillation is clear and should have the = highest=20 priority. Today, with the availability of AEDs, defibrillation is = considered=20 part of BLS. Adjunctive equipment should not divert attention or effort = from=20 basic resuscitative measures. Rescue personnel should know the = indications for=20 and techniques of using adjunctive equipment. Such equipment should be = tested=20 periodically according to prescribed regulations and each periodic test=20 documented.

Circulation. = 2000; 102(suppl=20 I):I-86-I-89.

=A9 2000 American = Heart=20 Association. Inc.

Circulation=20 is=20 available at http://www.circulationaha.org/=20